PDA

View Full Version : HP Review


850PoPo
07-10-2009, 10:02 AM
I'm looking onto getting another machine so I'm searching all over the Internet reading reviews and ran across this info so thought I'd share this to people that haven't seen this ! Here are the current HP ratings for the Big Bores. The info is from 2008-2009 certifications in CA. Most were in KW so I converted to HP as that is what most of us reference. Seems to be pretty accurate based on the machine reviews with the exception of the Cat. Not sure why it is down on power compared to the King since it is the same engine. Maybe the restrictive airbox setup??

These numbers are measured at the crank, not the rear wheels. If you would put your machine on a dyno, you would get a lower number due to losses from the tranny setup.

HP Ratings from Carb, listed highest to lowest hp.

Polaris 850______69.06 hp
Can Am 800 R____67.05 hp (updated 2/13 to 70.5 hp)
AC 1000_________65.84 hp
Can Am 800______61.7 hp
Can Am 650______55.4 hp
Brute 750 Carb____50.1 hp
Brute 750 EFI_____49.8 hp
King Quad 750____49.6 hp
AC Mud Pro_______49.06 hp
King 700_________48.5 hp
Polaris 800_______48.3 hp
Brute 650 I________46.3 hp
Grizzly 700________45.6 hp
Polaris 700_______44.3 hp
AC 700 H1_______41.4 hp
AC 700__________41.4 hp
Brute 650 ________41.4 hp (solid axle)
Grizzly 660_______40.9 hp
Can Am 500______40.4 hp
AC 650 H1_______39.3 hp
Rincon 680_______38.5 hp
Grizzly 550________36.9 hp
King 450_________36.7 hp